Internet Giant Google takes a record $3.57 billion fine

Table of Contents

Share at:

This is what happened yesterday when Google was fined a record of $3.57 billion by an EU competition regulator for breach of antitrust rules. To give some context, the original record for fines of this nature was $1.56 billion, awarded to Intel in 2009. The EU agency awarded the fine due to alleged attempts by Google to modify its search engine processes to provide illegal competitive advantages to its own products. In effect, Google products were placed first in searches while rival products would not appear until page 4 of searches. Firstly, this meant that consumers did not have a genuine range of options to choose from during shopping and secondly, this constituted anti-competitive conduct that is detrimental to the online shopping industry.

The Consequences

The fine devalued Google’s stock prices and this triggered a domino effect, causing other related major companies to drop in stock prices. The parent company, Alphabet lost up to $8.5 billion in value and various related stocks such as NASDAQ and Facebook fell in values of up to 1.61% and 5% respectively.

Financial losses aside, Google’s loss of reputation is arguably the most damaging for the corporation. Historically, many firms in similar positions have had themselves losing the best university talent to other competitors.

Context into the Competition Law

Antitrust law is basically another term for Competition Law. In Australia business competition is regulated by an independent body, the Australian Consumer and Competition Commission (ACCC) which operates under the Consumer and Competition Act 2010 (Cth).

In essence, the body promotes fair competition within Australian businesses and prevents any anti-competitive conduct – such as illegal monopolisation.

Final Thoughts

In this day and age, so much of our world’s progress stems from our prominent culture of innovation and that is partially a product of competition. It is only under the influence of competition that businesses are incentivised to embrace change, adapt to new processes and strive for innovation. Google’s attempt to transcend the Competition Laws and potentially monopolise the online-shopping industry goes against this very precept and thus has faced the punitive measures by the EU regulatory body.

As a concluding statement, it goes for all businesses that all conduct should be exercised with prudence to ensure that it conforms to Competition Laws and Regulations.

For more information about competition regulations and how it applies to your business, get in touch with an experienced Business Lawyer.

Let us know your thoughts on the Google incident by tagging us at #lawpath or @lawpath.

Share at:

Simplify creating legal documents today

Browse through Lawpath's AI tools which can be used to draft, review and refine legal documents today!

Related Articles

Competition Permits in Australia: A State-by-State Breakdown

Do you know when competition permits are required in Australia? Read this article to find out when they’re required in every state.

Casual Loading: When Do Employers Pay It?

Employers should be aware of when they need to pay their employees casual loading. Keep reading to find out when this applies.

Can A Sole Trader Hire Employees?

Can a sole trader hire employees? Short answer, yes. But as an employer, you have additional obligations to comply with.

Can An Employer Force You To Sign A New Contract?

Sometimes, employers will want to alter employment terms. Read here to find out if your employer can force you to sign a new contract.

Can I Sue For Lost Opportunity?

Yes, you can. However, the lost opportunity must arise from a contractual breach, misleading and deceptive conduct or negligence. See more.

Are Employers Liable When An Employee Makes A Mistake Due To Negligence?

Have you ever wondered if an employer is liable for their employee’s negligence? Read this article to find out.